Archive

Archive for the ‘Batman’ Category

Nov
26

There are lots of rumors about Dark Knight Rises! But know IGN brought us something new. What is it? Read below.

Batman-on-Film and Entertainment Weekly point out a report that originated at ScriptFlags, which claims to have heard from a public relations source that the third Nolan-directed Bat-film will be based on the “Prey” storyline that appeared in the comic book Legends of The Dark Knight issues #11-15.

Neither BoF nor EW are saying that “Prey” will be the basis for The Dark Knight Rises; they are merely reiterating the speculative scuttlebutt that’s out there online right now.

ScriptFlags reminds us that “Prey,” written by Doug Moench, is set during the early days of Batman’s career and “centers itself around Batman being pursued by the deranged police psychiatrist ..Doctor Hugo Strange. When a police officer Max Cort is sent to Strange for treatment for his hatred of vigilantes, Strange hypnotises Cort into becoming a costumed vigilante himself named Night Scourge in the hopes of bringing Batman out of hiding. Strange also convinces the mayor to prepare a special task force to capture Batman with Commissioner Gordon as its head.” Strange eventually learns Batman’s secret identity, but keeps the discovery to himself. Catwoman also appears in it.

“Prey” certainly lends itself to the world established in Nolan’s previous Batman films and would be a logical story to use as a structural basis for the threequel given the ending of The Dark Knight. So for the hell of it, let’s say this rumor pans out. Would Tom Hardy be playing Hugo Strange (whom he looked something like in Bronson) or perhaps the detective-turned-vigilante Cort?

It wouldn’t be out of the realm of possibility for Nolan and Co. to use “Prey” as the basis for their sequel. They may have drawn heavily from Batman: Year One for Batman Begins, but they also poached from less celebrated comic book stories such as “Batman: The Man Who Falls” and “Batman: Blind Justice,” which introduced the character of Henri Ducard. The Dark Knight was heavily influenced by Joker’s first appearance in Batman #1. It should be noted that Hugo Strange, like Joker and Catwoman, is among Batman’s earliest recurring villains, first appearing in 1940 in Detective Comics #36.

So what do you think?

You can check other Dark Knight Rises Movie News & Updates HERE.

Oct
29

So now the speculations about Batman 3’s title have ended. It will be “The Dark Knight Rises.”

Christopher Nolan has finally broken his silence about the forthcoming Dark Knight sequel, announcing the film’s title and ruling out a character who, up until this point, was thought to be a frontrunner for the villain of the piece.

Speaking to Hero Complex, Nolan revealed that the Batman 3 title will be The Dark Knight Rises, and in a move that may surprise some fans, he said that the film’s villain won’t be The Riddler.

That should come as a disappointment to Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hardy — thought to be favourites to win that particular part — although the latter will still apparently appear in an unspecified role.

Nolan also announced that the sequel would be shot in 2D rather than 3D, thereby retaining the high-definition IMAX approach that served him so well on the first two films.

The Dark Knight Rises will again be scripted by Christopher and Jonah Nolan, based on a story by David Goyer.

Make sure to check other Batman 3 news.

Oct
17

I know many fans are excited to know who will be the villains on Batman 3. So now here is a sneak peek revelaed by IGN in the news below. (Credits to IGN.com)

Now that Inception’s Tom Hardy has been cast in Christopher Nolan’s Batman 3, fanboy speculation has reached critical mass. So who will he play in the highly anticipated follow-up to The Dark Knight?

All we know at the moment is that it will be an unnamed “lead role,” though it seems fairly certain that Hardy — who is also supposed to take over in the title role in the fourth Mad Max film — will be playing a villain. But which villain… well, that’s far from clear.

Over the summer, rumors had pegged Hardy as being under consideration for the role of Riddler. But there are many other baddies in the pantheon of Bat villains who he might be playing. Here are a few who we think might be possibilities…

Let’s get the obvious one out of the way first. It seems as though everyone assumes that Nolan and his writers Jonathan Nolan and David Goyer are going to choose from the most popular members of Batman’s rogues gallery for this next film. So after the Joker and Two-Face, who of course were in the last film, who’s the best known? The Riddler is certainly up there, and he also seems a better fit than, say, the equally well-known Penguin.

And yet… why are we assuming that Nolan is going to go with a bad guy who even your grandma can identify? The director utilized Ra’s al Ghul in Batman Begins, far from a known quantity in the mainstream, so who’s to say that the rather obvious and pedestrian choice of the Riddler will happen for this next film?

Having said that, if Hardy does turn out to be playing Edward Nigma, we can expect the character be a darker and more realistic variation on Frank Gorshin’s beloved puzzle-master. We’re thinking the version seen in Hush, a genius in his own right. Certainly we know that Hardy can play a good villain — say what you will about Star Trek: Nemesis, but his turn as Shinzon was pretty creepy.

Nolan has said that the villain of the film may not be a “name,” and Professor Hugo Strange would sure fit that bill. Given the filmmaker’s interest in the psychological side of superheroing, not to mention how Strange has worked with mobsters and crooked politicians in the comics — themes that are endemic to Nolan’s bat-universe — this character could fit very well into the tapestry that Nolan has created.

In the modern continuity, Strange is a psychologist who was hired to help apprehend Batman — which could tie into the Caped Crusader’s fugitive-from-the-law arc that began at the end of The Dark Knight. He also manages to discover Batman’s secret identity, again tying into an aspect of Bruce Wayne which seems to deeply interest Nolan (the dual persona of the man). The character will also show up in the eagerly awaited Batman: Arkham City game, which will make him more recognizable to the casual fan too.

Here’s a character who once attempted to replace Batman as the protector of the streets, though he was ultimately thwarted when it was revealed that he was actually angling to take over the Gotham criminal world.

Also known as Floyd Lawton, Deadshot is a ruthless assassin and sometime member of the Suicide Squad, the DC universe’s version of the Dirty Dozen (only dirtier and with super powers). He’s a no-joke kind of villain, ruthless and deadly, and about as far from the Burton/Schumacher bat-films as you can get. Which is surely where Nolan likes to be. Plus, we know from Inception that Tom Hardy is really good with big guns.

Also known as Roman Sionis, Black Mask serves as a sort of parallel Bruce Wayne — born into money, but disfigured and insane, he turned to a life of crime. That would include, at one time, abducting members of the Wayne Enterprises board (Lucius Fox, anyone?). He’s sort of the bridge between mobsters and supervillains that would help keep Nolan’s film grounded.

Black Mask also has had a history with Catwoman, who rumor has it will also be in the film. Word on the street — and take this for what’s it’s worth at this early stage — is that as Batman recedes into inactivity in the wake of The Dark Knight, the Catwoman rises to battle the criminals who remain in his wake. Now in the comics, Black Mask went after Catwoman’s family for her interference in his plans and — get this — killed her brother-in-law and made her sister eat her husband’s remains.

As is often the case with Batman’s foes, Calendar Man is fixated on a particular topic of interest — in this case, dates. Often portrayed as being of the smalltime caliber of crook, the exception to this rule came in the excellent Batman: The Long Halloween, where he was a much more nefarious sort. As Batman hunts a serial killer down, Calendar Man advises the hero from Arkham Asylum, playing his own game of cat and mouse with Bats along the way.

We saw Batman fight the Joker in a battle of wits in The Dark Knight, when the Clown Prince of Crime was in police custody and Batman interrogated him. Using Calendar Man in Batman 3 in a manner similar to how he is portrayed in The Long Halloween could let Nolan take this concept and run with it… though hopefully Multiple Miggs won’t be around to throw anything at Batman.

In the comics these days, Dick Grayson is Batman and Bruce Wayne… isn’t (long story). But this isn’t the first time that Bruce has let the mantle of the bat fall to someone else. Back in the early 1990s, after the villain Bane broke Batman’s back, Bruce had no choice but to appoint a new Dark Knight — the hero formerly known as Azrael. All gussied up in a technologically enhanced suit of bat-armor, this character became the new Batman… until he went off the rails (people got killed and whatnot!) and Bruce was forced to reclaim the gig for himself.

This could track with the basic premise we’ve heard about Batman 3, as mentioned above. If Batman gives up on crime-fighting early in the film, perhaps he appoints a new Bat. Or maybe a new hero simply rises from the crime-ridden streets of Gotham to fill the void left by the true Batman’s departure. Either way, a Tom Hardy high-tech Azrael/Batman versus a Christian Bale old-school Batman could be pretty sweet… and it would also be a topic of interest for Nolan with the whole “how far is too far to protect Gotham” argument.

Speaking of which, Hardy might also make for a good Bane. The character, so terribly mis-portrayed in the hateful Batman & Robin, can actually be pretty scary. A monstrous, ‘roided-up killer, Bane’s physicality isn’t too far off from Tom Hardy’s character’s in the violent Bronson.

Also, there’s pretty much no chance of Uma Thurman showing up in Batman 3 to boss Bane around.

Like Black Mask, Hush — a.k.a. Dr. Thomas Elliot — goes back a long ways with Bruce Wayne. A childhood friend of Bruce’s, Elliot grows up resenting Bruce and the Wayne family because Bruce’s dad saved Elliot’s mom’s life. (Again, long story.) This leads to his taking on the persona of Hush and going after the Bat.

This is another character that serves as a parallel for Batman — rich, highly intelligent, skilled, and generally just good at everything. Except for being a good guy, that is, and therein lies the rub.

Now wait, don’t laugh. Obviously we’re not expecting Nolan to give us a Burgess Meredith style Penguin, quacking about in a tuxedo and with an umbrella. But the character, one of the best known of Batman’s enemies, can be handled in a more mature, less laughable way.

Just look at the “No Man’s Land” storyline from the comics, where the Penguin — Oswald Cobblepot (might have to modify that name too) — is a businessman with ties to the criminal underworld. Better if he’s not called “the Penguin” at all in the film, or at least not in his presence, but certainly we’d know that this is who Hardy is meant to be.

Another potentially outlandish character, Clayface can be done in a more sophisticated and realistic manner. Typically in the comics the Clayfaces (there have been several of them) are shapeshifters, and obviously that’s never going to happen in a Nolan bat-movie. So how to portray him?

Well, first you cast an ace actor, which is what has already happened with Hardy. Then you play up the “man of a thousand faces” aspect of the character rather than the clay thing. In fact, Hardy already played Eames, the Forger, in Inception — a character who assumes the forms of others. Clayface has also been depicted in a sympathetic light at times, which would be an interesting way to go with the villain of the new film (think Harvey Dent from The Dark Knight), only he’d be the antagonist for more than the last 15 minutes.

Any comments or insights? Post your picks below!

You can check other Dark Knight Rises Movie News & Updates HERE.

Sep
27

Hey Batman fans! I know that you are all waiting for some updates about the Dark Night sequel. Well we got this interview, and hopefully you’ll enjoy reading it.

Here is a fresh news from IGN:

Edward Norton has been discussing superhero movies, with the actor admitting that he’d love to work with Christopher Nolan on a Batman flick, and saying that he only has good feelings towards The Avengers movie.

Speaking exclusively to IGN to promote new movie Stone, Norton said that he loved playing Bruce Banner in The Incredible Hulk, and that he has no hard feelings regarding Marvel’s decision to go with Mark Ruffalo on Avengers.

“I think I said everything I want to say in the one thing I put out about that” he explained. “It was a great privilege to do it, and I couldn’t be more appreciative of everybody’s support and positivity towards that because I love those films too. And I hate it when they miss. I hate it when they miss on one – it seems like such a wasted opportunity. But the truth is I’m probably more naturally interested in doing something that I haven’t done. I have only good thoughts towards that though.”

Norton revealed that the situation hasn’t put him off the notion of superhero movies however, saying that if a good project came along, he’s sign up.

“Chris Nolan’s making the best ones out there by far” he explained “I’d do one with him. He’s set a new bar for sure, and I think he’s done a great, great job.”

We pushed Norton as to whether he’d be up for playing a villain in Batman 3, with the actor replying “That would be fun, I would not say no to that.”

And more specifically we asked if he’d like to play the Riddler, with the star simply smiling and saying “Your guys can put their votes in on that.”

You can check other Dark Knight Rises Movie News & Updates HERE.

Jun
15

July 20, 2012 is the given date for the release of Batman 3, but until now Christopher Nolan is still not signing any contract to direct the movie even though there are reports stating that Nolan is due to start filming a third Batman film in March. 

But when asked if he wants to have the “Batman 3” in 2-D or 3-D.

I’m not a huge fan of 3-D. The truth is, I think it’s a misnomer to call it 3-D versus 2-D. The whole point of cinematic imagery is it’s three-dimensional. … You know, 95% of our depth cues come from occlusion, resolution, color and so forth, so the idea of calling a 2-D movie a “2-D movie” is a little misleading.

The truth of it is when you watch a film in [a theater], you’re looking at 16 foot-lamberts [the measurement of luminence projected in an average movie theater]. When you watch through any of the conventional 3-D processes you’re giving up three foot-lamberts. A massive difference. You’re not that aware of it because once you’re “in that world,” your eye compensates, but having struggled for years to get theaters up to the proper brightness, we’re not sticking polarized filters in everything.

He also said that he tried making his latest movie “Inception” in 3-D. 

We did tests on Inception with the different post-conversion processes, and they all went very well. It’s quite easy to do, in fact. But it takes a little time, and we didn’t have time to do it to the standards that I would be happy with.

It’s all based on all the visual-effects technology, you know, that we’re currently most engaged in with match moving, so forth, and rendering 2-D imagery into a 3-D space. …On a technical level, it’s fascinating, but on an experiential level, I find the dimness of the image extremely alienating.

I’m certainly quite pleased with Inception as presented — it’s very bright and very clear, so as the technology improves, those differences may change, and that is what I hope for.

It is also a fact that Nolan is a great fan of IMAX as he shot some parts of Dark Knight with this technology, but still he is not convinced to make his next movie in 3-D. 

There are a lot of problems with [shooting in 3-D]… the idea of shooting a whole film through a massive beam-splitter and so forth — there are enormous compromises. Post-conversion technologies probably, for me, are definitely the future, but really it is up to the audiences what they want to see and how they want to watch their films.

So will Nolan really avoid 3-D technology?

Well, let me put it this way: There is no question if audiences want to watch films in stereoscopic imaging, that’s what the studios will be doing, and that’s what I’ll be doing.

There we got his answer that he is still open to this idea.

You can check other Dark Knight Rises Movie News & Updates HERE.

Jun
06
There are speculations everywhere about the probable villains on Batman 3. But one thing is for sure since Christopher Nolan answered it personally and emphatically, we will not see Joker again. Nolan answered the Joker re-cast question in an interview with Empire Magazine.

“No”, says Nolan emphatically. He refuses to elaborate and simply says, “I just don’t feel comfortable talking about it”.

We all know that Joker is a sure villain on “The Dark Knight” sequels since Nolan left him alive on top of the roof on the last movie. But Heath Ledger’s death changed everything. Nolan believes that Joker is Ledger and the legacy left should remain.
Nolan is also not sure if he will direct Batman 3 so discussing the movie details makes him uncomfortable. But for him, if ever he will be the director of the sequel, Joker already rests in peace with Ledger.You can check other Dark Knight Rises Movie News & Updates HERE.