Labor Law

UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN, INC. VS UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN EMPLOYEES UNION-FFW

UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN, INC. VS UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN EMPLOYEES UNION-FFW 593 SCRA 663 (2009) A collective bargaining agreement, when voluntarily entered into by the parties, becomes the law between them. In the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between University of San Agustin and its Employees Union, the parties agreed to include a provision on salary […]

Share this:

U-BIX CORPORATION and EDILBERTO B. BRAVO VS VALERIE ANNE H. HOLLERO 570 SCRA 373 (2008)

U-BIX CORPORATION and EDILBERTO B. BRAVO VS VALERIE ANNE H. HOLLERO 570 SCRA 373 (2008) An employer who seeks to dismiss an employee must afford the latter ample opportunity to be heard and to defend himself with the assistance of his representative if he so desires. Valerie Anne H. Hollero was hired as a management […]

Share this:

TAGAYTAY HIGHLANDS INTERNATIONAL GOLF CLUB INCORPORATED VS TAGAYTAY HIGHLANDS EMPLOYEES UNION-PGTWO 395 SCRA 638 (2003)

TAGAYTAY HIGHLANDS INTERNATIONAL GOLF CLUB INCORPORATED VS TAGAYTAY HIGHLANDS EMPLOYEES UNION-PGTWO 395 SCRA 638 (2003) After a certificate of registration is issued to a union, its legal personality cannot be subject to collateral attack and may be questioned only in an independent petition for cancellation. Respondent Tagaytay Highlands Employees Union (THEU)-Philippine Transport and General Workers […]

Share this:

SUNACE INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. VS NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION 480 SCRA 146 (2006)

SUNACE INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. VS NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION 480 SCRA 146 (2006) There is an implied revocation of an agency relationship when after the termination of the original employment contract, the foreign principal directly negotiated with the employee and entered into a new and separate employment contract. Respondent Divina Montehermozo is a domestic […]

Share this:

SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION VS PROSPERO A. ABALLA

SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION VS PROSPERO A. ABALLA 461 SCRA 392 (2005) The language of a contract disavowing the existence of an employer-employee relationship is not determinative of the parties’ relationship. It is the totality of the facts and surrounding circumstances of the case. Petitioner San Miguel Corporation (SMC) and Sunflower Multi-Purpose Cooperative (Sunflower) entered into […]

Share this:

ROSA C. RODOLFO VS PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

ROSA C. RODOLFO VS PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES 498 SCRA 377 (2006) “Promises or offers for a fee employment” is sufficient to warrant conviction for illegal recruitment. Petitioner Rosa C. Rodolfo approached private complainants Necitas Ferre and Narciso Corpus individually and invited them to apply for overseas employment in Dubai. Rodolfo, being their neighbor, Ferre […]

Share this:

RFM CORPORATION-FLOUR DIVISION and SFI FEEDS DIVISION VS KASAPIAN NG MANGGA-GAWANG PINAGKAISA-RFM (KAMPI-NAFLU-KMU) and SANDIGAN AT UGNAYAN NG MANGGAGAWANG PINAGKAISA-SFI (SUMAPI-NAFLU-KMU) 578 SCRA 34 (2009)

RFM CORPORATION-FLOUR DIVISION and SFI FEEDS DIVISION VS KASAPIAN NG MANGGA-GAWANG PINAGKAISA-RFM (KAMPI-NAFLU-KMU) and SANDIGAN AT UGNAYAN NG MANGGAGAWANG PINAGKAISA-SFI (SUMAPI-NAFLU-KMU) 578 SCRA 34 (2009) If the terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement are clear and leave no doubt upon the intention of the contracting parties, its literal meaning shall prevail. Petitioner RFM Corporation, a […]

Share this:

LORNA DISING PUNZAL VS ETSI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

LORNA DISING PUNZAL VS ETSI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 518 SCRA 66 (2007) No matter how much the employee dislikes the employer professionally, he cannot afford to be disrespectful. Petitioner Lorna Dising Punzal (Punzal) had been working for respondent ETSI Technologies, Inc. (ETSI) as Department Secretary. Punzal sent an e-mail message to her officemates announcing the holding […]

Share this:

PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. VS ENRIQUE LIGAN

PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. VS ENRIQUE LIGAN G.R. No. 146408, 30 April 2009 It must be stressed that respondents, having been declared to be regular employees, had acquired security of tenure. As such, they could only be dismissed by the real employer, on the basis of just or authorized cause, and with observance of procedural due […]

Share this:

RONALDO NICOL VS FOOT JOY INDUSTRIAL CORP

RONALDO NICOL   VS FOOT JOY INDUSTRIAL CORP 528 SCRA 300 (2007) The New Rules of Procedure of the NLRC, as amended, allows the reduction of the appeal bond. News of a temporary shutdown of respondent Foot Joy Industrial Corp. came about on February 2, 2001. Two days after, a fire razed the company and […]

Share this: