Archives by date

You are browsing the site archives for August 2013.

Case Digest: ROMULO v YNIGUEZ

ROMULO v YNIGUEZ FACTS Petitioners representing more than 1/5 of all members of the Batasan, filed Resolution No. 644, calling for the impeachment of President Marcos together with a verified complaint by impeachment. Said resolution and complaint were referred by the Speaker to the Committee on Justice, Human Rights and Good Government (CJHRGG). The committee […]

Share this:

Case Digest: CORINTHIAN REALTY, INC. v. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, et al.

CORINTHIAN REALTY, INC. v. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, et al. 394 SCRA 260 (2002) A co-owner who sells the entire property without obtaining the consent of the other co-owners does not render the sale null and void. The sale will affect only his own share but not those of the other co-owners who did not […]

Share this:

Case Digest: DARREL CORDERO, et al. v. F.S. MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

DARREL CORDERO, et al. v. F.S. MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 506 SCRA 451 (2006) Non-fulfillment of a suspensive condition in a contract of sale renders the latter ineffective and without force and effect. Belen Cordero, in her own behalf and as attorney-in-fact of her co-petitioners, entered into a contract to sell with respondent F.S. Management […]

Share this:

Case Digest: MARIA B. CHING v. JOSEPH C. GOYANKO, JR., et al.

MARIA B. CHING v. JOSEPH C. GOYANKO, JR., et al. 506 SCRA 735 (2006) In line with the policy of the State, the law emphatically prohibits the sale of properties between spouses. Respondents Joseph Goyanko et al. filed with the Regional Trial Court of Cebu City a complaint for recovery of property and damages against […]

Share this:

Case Digest: SPOUSES ILUMINADA and CIRILO CAPITLE v. FORTUNATA ELBAMBUENA et al.

SPOUSES ILUMINADA and CIRILO CAPITLE v. FORTUNATA ELBAMBUENA et al. 509 SCRA 444 (2006) Absent evidence to the contrary, the presumption is that public officers adhered to the provisions of Section 22 of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL). A Certificate of Land Ownership Award (CLOA) was issued to Cristobal Olar covering a parcel of […]

Share this:

Case Digest: BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. SPS. HOMOBONO AND LUZDELDIA TARAMPI

BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. SPS. HOMOBONO AND LUZDELDIA TARAMPI 574 SCRA 537 (2008) A writ of possession, unless annulled by a court of competent jurisdiction, remains the ministerial duty of the trial court. Spouses Homobono and Lusdeldia Tarampi (Spouses Tarampi) obtained loans from the Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI), which were secured […]

Share this:

Case Digest: UP BOARD OF REGENTS v RASUL

UP BOARD OF REGENTS v RASUL FACTS The UP Board of Regents appointed Dr. Felipe Estrella as the Director of Philippine General Hospital or PGH from September 1986 till April 1992. Barely 2 weeks after appointment, Dr. Abuava, as the President of the UP sent a memorandum to the Board of Regents to Reorganize PGH. […]

Share this:

Case Digest: RUBIO v PEOPLE’S HOMESITE AND HOUSING CORPORATION

RUBIO v PEOPLE’S HOMESITE AND HOUSING CORPORATION FACTS RA 3469 authorized the construction of Multi -Storey Tenement Buildings, which the respondent PHHC is tasked to administer and maintain. It issued original and permanent appointments to petitioners Rubio in these projects, holding regular and permanent positions provided for in the Plantilla of personnel of the projects. […]

Share this:

Case Digest: Beltran v. People of the Philippines

MEYNARDO L. BELTRAN, petitioner, vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, and HON. JUDGE FLORENTINO TUAZON, JR. being the Judge of the RTC, Branch 139, Makati City, respondents G.R. No. 137567. June 20, 2000 FACTS: The petitioner filed a petition for nullity of marriage on the ground of psychological incapacity. In her Answer to the said petition, petitioner’s […]

Share this:

Case Digest: Paz v. CA

ARMANDO JOSE y PAZ and MANILA CENTRAL BUS LINES (MCL), represented by its General Manager MR. DANILO T. DE DIOS, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, ROMMEL ABRAHAM, represented by his father FELIXBERTO ABRAHAM, JOSE MACARUBO and MERCEDES MACARUBO, respondents. G. R. Nos. 118441-42.        January 18, 2000. FACTS: On February 22, 1985, a […]

Share this: