Archives by date

You are browsing the site archives for August 2013.

VIRGEN SHIPPING CORPORATION VS JESUS B. BARRAQUIO

VIRGEN SHIPPING CORPORATION VS JESUS B. BARRAQUIO 597 SCRA 411 (2009) Resignation is defined as the voluntary act of an employee who finds himself in a situation where he believes that personal reasons cannot be sacrificed in favor of the exigency of the service and he has no other choice but to disassociate himself from […]

Share this:

UNITED PHILIPPINE LINES, INC. and/or HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, INC. VS FRANCISCO BESERIL

UNITED PHILIPPINE LINES, INC. and/or HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, INC. VS FRANCISCO BESERIL 487 SCRA 248 (2006) The law does not require that the illness should be incurable, what is important is that he was unable to perform his customary work for more than 120 days which constitutes permanent total disability, thus, an award of a […]

Share this:

PATRICIA I. TIONGSON VS NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY

PATRICIA I. TIONGSON VS NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY 558 SCRA 56 (2008) In a situation where a government agency, in this case the National Housing Authority, took possession of properties belonging to private individuals for purposes of expropriation and the laws by virtue of which such government agency expropriated the subject properties were subsequently declared to […]

Share this:

ROSALINA TAGLE VS COURT OF APPEALS

ROSALINA TAGLE VS COURT OF APPEALS 466 SCRA 521 (2005) When the provisions of the employment contract are clear and unambiguous, its literal meaning controls. Wilfredo Tagle (Wilfredo), husband of petitioner Rosalina Tagle (Rosalina), was recruited by respondent Fast International Corporation (FIC) to work as fisherman at Taiwan for its principal, respondent Kuo Tung Yu […]

Share this:

STA. CATALINA COLLEGE VS NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISION

STA. CATALINA COLLEGE VS NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISION 416 SCRA 233 (2003) For a valid finding of abandonment, two factors must be present: (1) the failure to report for work, or absence without valid or justifiable reason; and (2) a clear intention to sever employer-employee relationship, with the second element as the more determinative factor, […]

Share this:

SAN MIGUEL FOODS INC. VS SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION EMPLOYEES UNION-PTWGO

SAN MIGUEL FOODS INC. VS SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION EMPLOYEES UNION-PTWGO 535 SCRA 133 (2007) Gross or flagrant violation of the seniority rule under the CBA is an unfair labor practice which the Labor Arbiter has jurisdiction. Some employees of San Miguel Foods Inc. (SMFI) brought grievance against Finance Manager Gideo Montesa for discrimination, favouritism, unfair labor […]

Share this:

IBARRA P. ORTEGA VS SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION and SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

IBARRA P. ORTEGA VS SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION and SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM 555 SCRA 53 (2008) Claims under the Labor Code for compensation and under the Social Security Law for benefits are not the same as to their nature and purpose. Petitioner Ibarra Ortega, member of respondent Social Security System (SSS) filed claims for partial permanent […]

Share this:

MOTOROLA PHILIPPINES, INC. VS IMELDA B. AMBROCIO

MOTOROLA PHILIPPINES, INC. VS IMELDA B. AMBROCIO 582 SCRA 502 (2009) When a company provides a Redundancy Program in favor of the dismissed employees, the latter already received what was due them under the law. Sometime in 1997, Motorola Philippines, Inc. (MPI) decided to close its Parañaque plant in order to consolidate its operations. It […]

Share this:

Case Digest: JOAQUIN VDA. DE AGREGADO v. BELLOSILLO, et al.

JOAQUIN VDA. DE AGREGADO v. BELLOSILLO, et al. 466 SCRA 29 (2005) A judge is expected to observe the care and diligence required of him in the performance of his duties. Complainant Susana Joaquin Vda. de Agregado filed a complaint for a sum of money and damages against Jose Marcell Panlilio et al. before the […]

Share this:

Case Digest: NESTOR F. DANTES v. JUDGE RAMON S. CAGUIOA

NESTOR F. DANTES v. JUDGE RAMON S. CAGUIOA 461 SCRA 236 (2005) Where the law violated is so elementary for a judge not to know it or to act as if he does not know it constitutes gross ignorance. Atty. Nestor Dantes (Dantes) was the counsel in a case for the declaration of nullity of […]

Share this: