Labor Law

CITIBANK N.A. VS NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION and ROSITA TAN PARAGAS

CITIBANK N.A. VS NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION and ROSITA TAN PARAGAS 563 SCRA 87 (2008) The general prayer of “other reliefs” is applicable only to such other reliefs warranted by law and facts. Rosita Tan Paragas (Paragas) worked as a filing clerk of Citibank, N.A. (Citibank) for eighteen (18) years. She was terminated by Citibank […]

Share this:

CHUAYUCO STEEL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION AND/OR EDWIN CHUA VS BUKLOD NG MANGGAGAWA SA CHUAYUCO STEEL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION

CHUAYUCO STEEL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION AND/OR EDWIN CHUA VS BUKLOD NG MANGGAGAWA SA CHUAYUCO STEEL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION 513 SCRA 621 (2007) A union officer who knowingly participates in an illegal strike and a worker who knowingly participates in the commission of an illegal strike are deemed to have lost their employment status. Buklod ng Manggagawa sa […]

Share this:

CAPITOL WIRELESS, INC. VS CARLOS ANTONIO BALAGOT

CAPITOL WIRELESS, INC. VS CARLOS ANTONIO BALAGOT 513 SCRA 672 (2007) Double job per se is not illegal according to Labor Code. Capitol Wireless, Inc. (Capwire) hired Carlos Antonio Balagot (Balagot) as collector on September 16, 1987. Carlos is required to work outside the office and Capwire assigned to him a motorcycle as a service […]

Share this:

CABALEN MANAGEMENT CO., INC. VS JESUS P. QUIAMBAO

CABALEN MANAGEMENT CO., INC. VS JESUS P. QUIAMBAO 528 SCRA 153 (2007) It is a well-established rule that the employer has the burden of proving a valid dismissal of an employee, for which it must be for a just or authorized cause and with due process. Jesus Quiambao, et al. were charged of tip pocketing […]

Share this:

BILFLEX PHIL. INC. LABOR UNION et al. VS FILFLEX INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING CORPORATION AND BILFLEX (PHILS.), INC.

BILFLEX PHIL. INC. LABOR UNION et al. VS FILFLEX INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING CORPORATION AND BILFLEX (PHILS.), INC. 511 SCRA 247 (2006) Any union officer who knowingly participates in an illegal strike and any worker or union who knowingly participates in the commission of illegal acts during a strike may be declared to have lost his […]

Share this:

BACOLOD-TALISAY REALTY AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS ROMEO DELA CRUZ

BACOLOD-TALISAY REALTY AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS ROMEO DELA CRUZ 587 SCRA 304 (2009) The twin notice requirement provided by law should be observed in order for a dismissal to be valid. Romeo dela Cruz (respondent) is an employee of Bacolod-Talisay Realty Development Corporation (Bacolod-Talisay) as an overseer. He was suspended for 30 days for payroll […]

Share this:

ASIA PACIFIC CHARTERING (PHILS.) INC. VS MARIA LINDA R. FAROLAN

ASIA PACIFIC CHARTERING (PHILS.) INC. VS MARIA LINDA R. FAROLAN 393 SCRA 454 (2002) The termination of a managerial employee on the ground of “loss of confidence” should have a basis and the determination of the same cannot be left entirely to the employer. Petitioner Asia Pacific Chartering (Phils.) Inc. (Asia) is tasked with the […]

Share this:

ARELLANO UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES AND WORKERS UNION VS COURT OF APPEALS

ARELLANO UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES AND WORKERS UNION VS COURT OF APPEALS 502 SCRA 219 (2006) An ordinary striking worker may not be declared to have lost his employment status by mere participation in an illegal strike. The Arellano University Employees and Workers Union (the Union), the exclusive bargaining representative of about 380 rank-and-file employees of Arellano […]

Share this:

Labor Law Review MCQs – Set 2

Take the Labor Law Review MCQs – Set 2 Quiz.   How to report an erroneous question? See HERE.

Share this:

Labor Law Review MCQs – Set 1

Take the Labor Law Review MCQs – Set 1 Quiz.   How to report an erroneous question? See HERE.

Share this: