Take the Intellectual Property Law MCQs – Set 1 Quiz.
Intellectual Property Law - Set 1 [20 items]
Question 1 |
[IPL0101] Mr. Dela Cruz, a first year law student of University of Luzon, photocopied some pages of the Criminal Law book authored by Atty. L. Boado . Atty. Cruz, his professor in Criminal Law 1, saw the photocopies during one of their classes. He scolded Mr. Dela Cruz for not buying the original book and told him that he violated the copyright law and maybe penalized. Is Atty. Cruz correct?
A | No, because he did not reproduced the whole book but only some of its pages, it can be permitted even without the consent of the owner of the copyright. |
B | No, because Mr. Dela Cruz reproduced a single copy only, exclusively for his private study and he did not gain any profit for photocopying some of the pages of the book. |
C | Yes, because the book was photocopied without the consent of the author and used publicly in a classroom. |
D | No, because the private reproduction of a published work in a single copy, where the reproduction is made by a natural person exclusively for research and private study, shall be permitted, without the authorization of the owner of copyright in the work. |
Question 2 |
[IPL0104] Read the following statements and determine which of the choices are correct:
Statement 1: Infringement is the use by others without the registrant’s consent of a reproduction or colorable imitation of his trademark, tradename or service mark with the purpose of causing to mislead or misleading the public that those goods or services are those of the registrant.
Statement 2: The definition of infringement implies that only registered trademarks, trade names and service marks are protected against infringement or unauthorized use by another or others
A | Neither statements is true |
B | Only Statement 2 is true |
C | Both statements are true |
D | Only Statement 1 is true |
Question 3 |
[IPL0117] Mark manufactured rubber shoes under the brand name of Koby. He did not register it but it became popular. Years later, Nelson manufactured rubber shoes using the same design and color as Koby but named it as Shak. Mark filed a case against Nelson. Nelson contended that the name Koby is not protected. Rule.
A | Nelson is not liable since the name is not registered |
B | Nelson is liable since the name is already popular |
C | Nelson is liable but not for infringement |
D | Nelson is not liable because he gave it a different name |
Question 4 |
[IPL0116] X sold its energy drink under the brand name of Cobra. He registered a trademark for the drink. Subsequently, Y manufactured boots and sold it under the name of Cobra. X knows that there is no infringement since they have different products. But he wants to file a case on the ground of the theory of dilution so that the case will prosper. He asks you now what are the conditions so he can use this theory.
A | Actual damage is suffered by the X |
B | There is confusion in the market as a result of the same brand name with different products |
C | If there is a connection between the energy drink and the boots |
D | None of the choices |
Question 5 |
A | All choices |
B | A preliminary injunction under the rules of court is not the proper remedy in this case |
C | The copyright and patent registration of a trade name would not guarantee the registrant the right to the exclusive use of the product, not being the proper subjects thereof. |
D | The copyright and patent of the name effectively protects Paul from unauthorized use of the same to the exclusion of others |
Question 6 |
[IPL0119] Alberto found that the theory of relativity of Einstein is wrong and the correct formula is E=MC/2. He filed a patent for the same. A relative of Einstein learned of the application and went here to pray for the denial of the application. Rule.
A | The relative of Einstein has no personality to file the petition |
B | None of the choices |
C | The application should be denied since the formula has no relevance to any human activity or solves any problem |
D | The application should be denied since the new formula needs to be validated by the science community |
Question 7 |
[IPL0112] Ely commissioned Marcus, a renowned artist, to paint a mural in the lobby of his newly renovated building located at Binondo, for the sum of P2.0 million. Later on, an infringement case was filed by Marcus against Raimund. Raimund contended that Marcus has no right to file the case. Rule.
A | Marcus has a right since he owns the copyright to the painting , being its creator. |
B | Marcus has no right because he has no interest to the painting |
C | Marcus has no right since Ely owns the painting |
D | Marcus has a right provided he obtains the consent of Ely being as the owner of the painting. |
Question 8 |
[IPL0108] The Sogod Hotel chain reproduces DVD’s, distributes the copies thereof to its hotels and makes them available to hotel guests for viewing in the hotel guest rooms and charges a separate fee for the use of the DVD players. Is Sogod Hotel liable for infringement?
A | None of the choices |
B | No, the DVD viewing is done privately in the hotel guest rooms. |
C | Yes, because the reproduction of the DVD’s violate the copyright or economic rights of the owner of the film. The hotel charge fees for the use of DVD player as well as there are room charges, they earn gain from the use of the DVD because it entice the guests to check-in in their hotel. |
D | No, the DVD viewing is part of the hotel services and it is the use of the DVD players that is charged and not the cost of the DVD. |
Question 9 |
[IPL0110] The infringer is liable to the following:
Statement 1: An injunction for such infringement
Statement 2: Pay actual, moral and exemplary damages
Statement 3: Deliver for impounding of the articles alleged to infringe a copyright
Statement 4: Deliver for destruction all copies, devices and other means used for making the infringing copies
A | Statement 2 |
B | All statements |
C | Statement 3 |
D | Statement 1 |
Question 10 |
[IPL0114] Rico is a laptop repair technician. A defective laptop was sold to him. He was able to fix. In its hardrive, he found a program which he used to develop FACELOOK. Later, Bob filed an action for damages on account of an infringement of copyright on the program which he owns. Rico raised as a defense that he was unaware that what he used was a copyright material. Rule.
A | The defense is not valid since there was bad faith when he copied the program considering that the laptop was only sold to him |
B | The defense is not valid. It is immaterial whether the infringer was aware or not that the material he copied has a copyright. |
C | The defense is valid. Good faith can be used in this case since the laptop is already beyond repair when it was sold to him. |
D | The defense is valid since the computer program is an invention hence, not covered by a copyright |
Question 11 |
Application 1: Patent for the treatment of the human body by therapy Application 2: Trademark for the signature of President Marcos with the consent of Senator Bong Bong Marcos Application 3: Copyright for a computer program invented by a professor
Which should be approved?
A | Application 3 |
B | Application 2 |
C | Application 1 |
D | Applications 2 & 3 |
Question 12 |
[IPL0103] Atty. Ana Maganda wrote a legal opinion for a client on the differences of a probationary, regular, casual and seasonal employee. She quoted without permission Atty. Aliling’s comment appearing in his book “Annotations on the Labor Code”, but she indicated the source of the quotation, the book and the author’s name. Atty Aliling is a labor law expert. Can Atty. Aliling hold Atty. Ana Maganda liable for infringement of copyright for quoting a portion of his book without his permission?
A | Yes, because Atty. Ana Maganda used the work of another for her own gain. |
B | No, because the Intellectual Property Code provides that a quotation from a copyrighted work can be used for judicial proceedings or for giving professorial advice by legal practitioner, provided the source are identified. |
C | Yes, because Atty. Ana Maganda copied somebody else’s work without the original author’s consent. |
D | No, because everybody can quote somebody as long as the source and the name of the author of the quotation are identified. |
Question 13 |
[IPL0105] To establish trademark infringement, the following elements must be shown: (1) the validity of the plaintiff’s mark; (2) the plaintiff’s ownership of the mark; and (3) the use of the mark or its colorable imitation by the alleged infringer results in “likelihood of confusion” Of these, the element of ______________ is the gravamen of trademark infringement.
A | Element No. 3 |
B | Element No. 2 |
C | None |
D | Element no. 1 |
Question 14 |
[IPL0106] Unilevel Corporation asked your legal advice regarding their plan to use a trademark with the words “SWEET CANDY” However, there is an existing and registered trademark using the words “TWEET CANDY” Which of the following advices are correct.
A | They can use the SWEET CANDY as long as there will be a very different packaging and flavors so as not to mislead the public. |
B | None of the choices |
C | Unilevel is a well-known company and their products are patronized country-wide, they can use the trademark SWEET CANDY because TWEET CANDY is owned by a small-time company whose market is within Luzon only. |
D | The firm must abandon the plan because another company uses the trademark Tweet Candy and there is a danger of a suit for infringement. The words Sweet and Tweet is almost similar in sound and they can confuse or mislead the public. |
Question 15 |
A | A biography containing your life, love and success. |
B | None of the choices |
C | News of the day and other facts having the character of mere press information. |
D | Any work of the Government of the Philippines. |
Question 16 |
[IPL0118] Che Che invented a device that can transform rain into fuel. He asked guevarra to help him register it. Guevarra suggested that they form a company and register the same. While the application is pending, CheChe died. Castro, the estranged husband of CheChe now comes contesting the application of the corporation and filed his own patent application as the sole surviving heir. Rule.
A | Castro has a right provided it is proven in the estate proceedings of Che Che |
B | Castro has no right since property rights to the invention already passed to the corporation |
C | Castro has a right being the heir of Che Che. It also appears that the corporation is not authorized to file the application |
D | Castro has no right since the right to the invention retroacts from its filing hence, favors the corporation |
Question 17 |
[IPL0115] Piolo and Sam are famous personalities who kept a secret love affair. They used a special instant messaging service which allows them to see one another’s typing on their screen as each letter is pressed. When KC, the controller of the service facility, found out their identities, she kept a copy of all the messages, including the song composed by Sam for Piolo, and later published them. Is KC liable for copyright infringement?
A | Yes, the law does not distinguish if the letters are handwritten or in electronic form |
B | No, the letters are not in the form required by law to be protected by copyright |
C | No, there is no artistic or literary work in the letters published |
D | Yes, provided the electronic data is authenticated |
Question 18 |
[IPL0102] Kris Aquino commissioned Mr. Magaling to write a biography of her late father, Ninoy Aquino, for a fee. Upon completion of the work, Kris paid Mr. Magaling the agreed price. The biography was copyrighted. Kris, however, changed her mind again upon reading the book and decided not to have it published. Can Kris Aquino sell the property without the consent of Mr. Magaling?
A | Mr. Magaling entered into a contract with Kris Aquino and having compensated, he had parted with all his rights to the said book, in effect making Kris his assignee. |
B | The assignee’s rights include the right to sell the work without the consent of the writer, Mr. Magaling. |
C | Yes, Kris Aquino can sell the copyrighted biography of her father without need of securing the consent of Mr. Magaling, the writer of said biography. |
D | All choices |
Question 19 |
[IPL0109] Narciso Planas invented a gas-saving device, manufactured and sold it to the market without securing a patent. San Miguel Co., a rich and well-known company, bought one gadget, dismantled the device and studied it. In due time, the company is manufacturing a gas-saving device similar to the invention of Narciso Planas. Before offering it for sale, the company secured a patent. Below are the actions and defenses available for Narciso Planas. Which of the following statements are correct?
Statement 1: Narciso Planas should first bring an action for the cancellation of the patent illegally secured by San Miguel Company and on the said proceedings, he must prove that he invented the device.
Statement 2: Narciso Planas, being the inventor of the gadget, is the owner of an intellectual creation and is entitled to legal protection of said property right from the unauthorized use of the same by another person or entity.
Statement 3: While the cancellation proceedings are pending, Narciso Planas may ask the court for preliminary injunction to prevent San Miguel from manufacturing more gadgets.
Statement 4: San Miguel Co. has a better right over the invention because they secured a patent before selling the device.
A | Statement 4 is correct |
B | Statements 1 and 2 are correct. |
C | Statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct |
D | Statements 1 and 3 are correct |
Question 20 |
[IPL0113] Ely commissioned Marcus, a renowned artist, to paint a mural in the lobby of his newly renovated building located at Binondo, for the sum of P2.0 million. Later on, an infringement case was filed by Marcus against Raimund. Raimund contended that Marcus has no right to file the case. Raimund presented as evidence the contract of Ely and Marcus with a stipulation that the copyright will be owned by A. Rule.
A | Raimund cannot use the stipulation since he was not a party thereof |
B | The stipulation is immaterial since no copyright was registered for the painting |
C | The stipulation effectively puts the ownership of the copyright to Ely |
D | The stipulation is not valid since it is contrary to public policy and good custom |
← |
List |
→ |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
End |
How to report an erroneous question? See HERE.